United States v. Diaz

46 F. App'x 718
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 27, 2002·No. No. 02-6312·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Luis Raul Diaz appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motion for an evidentiary hearing, on the grounds that the Government should have filed a motion for the reduction of his sentence under [719]*719Fed.R.Crim.P. 85(b), and denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Diaz, No. CR-00-113 (E.D.Va. filed Dec. 7, 2002 & entered Dec. 10, 2001; filed Dec. 20, 2000 & entered Dec. 21, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Diaz, 46 F. App'x 718 (4th Cir. 2002).

46 F. App'x 718 (United States v. Diaz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Diaz v. United States
539 U.S. 910 (Supreme Court, 2003)