United States v. Diaz

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Diaz. Read the opinion of the Court — 46 F. App'x 718
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 7, 1999·No. 99-6797·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6797

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

FELIX D. DIAZ, a/k/a Papo,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CR-91-322)

Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 7, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Felix D. Diaz, Appellant Pro Se. Rita Marie Glavin, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Felix D. Diaz appeals from the district court’s order denying

his motion to reconsider its order denying relief on his petition

for a writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-

ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United

States v. Diaz, No. CR-91-322 (E.D. Va. Jan. 12, 1999). We dis-

pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Diaz, (4th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Diaz (United States v. Diaz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.