United States v. Dial

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6328

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CLYDE DIAL, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:02-cr-00090-F-1)

Submitted: November 16, 2009 Decided: March 25, 2010

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clyde Dial, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A. Renfer, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Clyde Dial, Jr. appeals the district court’s order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction

in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Dial, No. 7:02-cr-00090-F-1

(E.D.N.C. Feb. 9, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED