United States v. Di Donna
276 F.2d 956
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided April 8, 1960·No. No. 280, Docket 25881·Published·Cited by 13 cases
Opinion
The trial judge properly refused to give the jury any instruction on the subject of entrapment. There was no evidence in the record to support such a defense as the defendant himself testified that he did not know what was in the package which he admittedly delivered to the narcotics agent. United States v. Pagano, 2 Cir., 1953, 207 F.2d 884, 885. The other allegations of error are entirely without merit.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Di Donna, 276 F.2d 956 (2d Cir. 1960).
276 F.2d 956 (United States v. Di Donna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Olga Valencia and William Suarez Valencia
645 F.2d 1158 (Second Circuit, 1980)
United States v. Walter Swiderski and Maritza De Los Santos
539 F.2d 854 (Second Circuit, 1976)
William Clayton Pierce v. United States
414 F.2d 163 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)
Willie McCarty Jr. v. United States
379 F.2d 285 (Fifth Circuit, 1967)
United States v. John F. Bishop
367 F.2d 806 (Second Circuit, 1966)
United States v. Richard T. Gosser, United States of America v. Donald J. Pinciotti, United States of America v. Ted Maison
339 F.2d 102 (Sixth Circuit, 1964)
Earl Johnson v. United States
317 F.2d 127 (D.C. Circuit, 1963)
Richard Sylvia v. United States
312 F.2d 145 (First Circuit, 1963)