United States v. Di Donna

Second Circuit

United States v. Di Donna

276 F.2d 956

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedApril 8, 1960

DocketNo. 280, Docket 25881

StatusPublished

Cited by13 cases

This text of 276 F.2d 956 (United States v. Di Donna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Di Donna, 276 F.2d 956 (2d Cir. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial judge properly refused to give the jury any instruction on the subject of entrapment. There was no evidence in the record to support such a defense as the defendant himself testified that he did not know what was in the package which he admittedly delivered to the narcotics agent. United States v. Pagano, 2 Cir., 1953, 207 F.2d 884, 885. The other allegations of error are entirely without merit.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial judge properly refused to give the jury any instruction on the subject of entrapment. There was no evidence in the record to support such a defense as the defendant himself testified that he did not know what was in the package which he admittedly delivered to the narcotics agent. United States v. Pagano, 2 Cir., 1953, 207 F.2d 884, 885. The other allegations of error are entirely without merit.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 F.2d 956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-di-donna-ca2-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack