United States v. DeWees
19 C.M.A. 571, 19 USCMA 571, 42 C.M.R. 173, 1970 CMA LEXIS 797, 1970 WL 7031
Opinions
Opinion of the Court
The question presented by this appeal is whether error was committed by the military judge when he examined the sentence provision of a pretrial agreement between the accused and the convening authority. We considered this question in United States v Villa, 19 USCMA 564, 42 CMR 166 (1970), and for the reasons set out [572]*572in our opinion in that case, we conclude there was no error.
The decision of the United States Army Court of Military Review is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. DeWees, 19 C.M.A. 571, 19 USCMA 571, 42 C.M.R. 173, 1970 CMA LEXIS 797, 1970 WL 7031 (cma 1970).
19 C.M.A. 571 (United States v. DeWees) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Villa
19 C.M.A. 564 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)