United States v. DeWees

19 C.M.A. 571, 19 USCMA 571, 42 C.M.R. 173, 1970 CMA LEXIS 797, 1970 WL 7031
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedJuly 17, 1970
DocketNo. 22,932
StatusPublished

This text of 19 C.M.A. 571 (United States v. DeWees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. DeWees, 19 C.M.A. 571, 19 USCMA 571, 42 C.M.R. 173, 1970 CMA LEXIS 797, 1970 WL 7031 (cma 1970).

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

The question presented by this appeal is whether error was committed by the military judge when he examined the sentence provision of a pretrial agreement between the accused and the convening authority. We considered this question in United States v Villa, 19 USCMA 564, 42 CMR 166 (1970), and for the reasons set out [572]*572in our opinion in that case, we conclude there was no error.

The decision of the United States Army Court of Military Review is affirmed.

Judge DARDEN concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Villa
19 C.M.A. 564 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 C.M.A. 571, 19 USCMA 571, 42 C.M.R. 173, 1970 CMA LEXIS 797, 1970 WL 7031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dewees-cma-1970.