United States v. Deshawn Travis Glover

351 F. App'x 405
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Deshawn Travis Glover. Read the opinion of the Court — 686 F.3d 1203
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided November 3, 2009·No. 09-13301·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for DeShawn Travis Glover in this appeal from the denial of a motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c), has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of Glover’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Deshawn Travis Glover, 351 F. App'x 405 (11th Cir. 2009).

351 F. App'x 405 (United States v. Deshawn Travis Glover) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)