United States v. Derrick Hatfield

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 2, 2013·No. 13-6763·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6763

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DERRICK TYRONE HATFIELD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:99-cr-00068-WO-1)

Submitted: September 24, 2013 Decided: October 2, 2013

Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derrick Tyrone Hatfield, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Blue Boggs, Robert Michael Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Derrick Tyrone Hatfield appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for

reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Hatfield, No. 1:99-cr-

00068-WO-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 24, 2013). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Derrick Hatfield, (4th Cir. 2013).

United States v. Derrick Hatfield (United States v. Derrick Hatfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related