United States v. Derek Merchant

538 F. App'x 236
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedOctober 31, 2013
Docket13-2104
StatusUnpublished

This text of 538 F. App'x 236 (United States v. Derek Merchant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Derek Merchant, 538 F. App'x 236 (3d Cir. 2013).

Opinion

JUDGMENT ORDER

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that Appellant argues that the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, Pub.L. No. 111-220, 124 Stat. 2372 (2010) (“FSA”), applies fully and retroactively to defendants who, like him, were sentenced before its effective date; it further appearing that the FSA for cocaine base offenses became effective subsequent to the sentencing of Appellant for distribution and possession with intent to distribute more than 50 grams of cocaine; it further appearing that the mandatory minimum sentence requirements of the FSA do not apply to Appellant, see United States v. Reevey, 631 F.3d 110, 111 (3d Cir.2010); and it further appearing that the order denying Appellant’s Motion to Reduce Sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) was not in error; on consideration whereof, it is now hereby ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the judgment of the District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania as entered April 3, 2013 at D.C.Crim. No. l-07-cr-00419-001 be and is hereby AFFIRMED.

Costs shall not be taxed in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Reevey
631 F.3d 110 (Third Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
538 F. App'x 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-derek-merchant-ca3-2013.