United States v. Demetrius Devon Fitzgerald

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedNovember 28, 2018
Docket17-15285
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Demetrius Devon Fitzgerald (United States v. Demetrius Devon Fitzgerald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Demetrius Devon Fitzgerald, (11th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

Case: 17-15285 Date Filed: 11/28/2018 Page: 1 of 4

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________

No. 17-15285 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________

D.C. Docket No. 9:17-cr-80042-RLR-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DEMETRIUS DEVON FITZGERALD, a.k.a. Demtemoivs D. Fitzgerald, a.k.a. Fat Mimi,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________

(November 28, 2018) Case: 17-15285 Date Filed: 11/28/2018 Page: 2 of 4

Before TJOFLAT, NEWSOM, and EDMONSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Demetrius Fitzgerald appeals his 240-month total sentence for being a felon

in possession of a firearm, possessing with intent to distribute oxycodone,

marijuana, and alprazolam, and possessing multiple firearms in furtherance of a

drug trafficking crime. Fitzgerald argues that the district court erred in treating

him as an armed career criminal and a career offender because his Florida

aggravated battery with a deadly weapon and resisting arrest with violence

convictions were not predicate offenses under the elements clause of the Armed

Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”) and the career-offender guideline.

We review de novo whether a prior conviction qualifies as a violent felony

under the ACCA or a crime of violence under the career-offender guideline.

United States v. Seabrooks, 839 F.3d 1326, 1338 (11th Cir. 2016) (ACCA), cert.

denied, 137 S. Ct. 2265 (2017); United States v. Vail-Bailon, 868 F.3d 1293, 1296

(11th Cir. 2017) (en banc) (career offender), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 2620 (2018).

We apply the same analysis for both ACCA violent felonies and crimes of violence

under the sentencing guidelines, as they are “virtually identical.” United States v.

Rainey, 362 F.3d 733, 734 (11th Cir. 2004).

2 Case: 17-15285 Date Filed: 11/28/2018 Page: 3 of 4

A defendant who violates 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) and has at least 3 earlier

convictions for violent felonies or serious drug offenses is subject to an enhanced

statutory sentence of 15 years to life imprisonment. 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). To

qualify as a career offender a defendant must have at least two prior felony

convictions for a crime of violence or a controlled substance offense. U.S.S.G. §

4B1.1(a)(3). Under the elements clauses in the ACCA and career-offender

guidelines, an offense is a violent felony or a crime of violence if it “has as an

element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the

person of another.” 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B); U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a).

In United States v. Romo-Villalobos, we concluded that a Florida conviction

for resisting arrest with violence constituted a crime of violence under the elements

clause of the career-offender guideline. 674 F.3d 1246, 1249 (11th Cir. 2012). In

United States v. Hill, we reaffirmed our holding in Romo-Villalobos after the

Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015).

799 F.3d 1318, 1322-23 (11th Cir. 2015); see also United States v. Joyner, 882

F.3d 1369, 1378 (11th Cir. 2018), petition for cert. filed, (U.S. May 23, 2018) (No.

17-9128). In Turner v. Warden Coleman FCI, we concluded that a Florida

conviction for aggravated battery with a deadly weapon satisfied the elements

clause of the ACCA. 709 F.3d 1328, 1341 (11th Cir. 2013). We have reaffirmed

3 Case: 17-15285 Date Filed: 11/28/2018 Page: 4 of 4

our holding in Turner after Johnson. United States v. Golden, 854 F.3d 1256, 1257

(11th Cir. 2017); In re Hires, 825 F.3d 1297, 1301 (11th Cir. 2016).

Under the prior precedent rule, we are bound by a prior binding precedent

“unless and until it is overruled” by this Court en banc or by the Supreme Court.

United States v. Vega-Castillo, 540 F.3d 1235, 1236 (11th Cir. 2008) (quotation

marks omitted).

Here, the district court properly sentenced Fitzgerald as an armed career

criminal and a career offender because his four total prior Florida convictions for

aggravated battery with a deadly weapon and resisting arrest with violence are

violent felonies and crimes of violence in the light of our prior precedent. See Hill,

799 F.3d at 1322 (resisting arrest with violence); Turner, 709 F.3d at 1341

(aggravated battery with a deadly weapon).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Melvin Junior Rainey
362 F.3d 733 (Eleventh Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Romo-Villalobos
674 F.3d 1246 (Eleventh Circuit, 2012)
Michael Turner v. Warden Coleman FCI (Medium)
709 F.3d 1328 (Eleventh Circuit, 2013)
Johnson v. United States
576 U.S. 591 (Supreme Court, 2015)
United States v. Tywan Hill
799 F.3d 1318 (Eleventh Circuit, 2015)
In re. Morris Vernell Hires, Jr.
825 F.3d 1297 (Eleventh Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Isaac Seabrooks
839 F.3d 1326 (Eleventh Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Warren Travis Golden
854 F.3d 1256 (Eleventh Circuit, 2017)
United States v. Eddy Wilmer Vail-Bailon
868 F.3d 1293 (Eleventh Circuit, 2017)
United States v. Keenan Joyner
882 F.3d 1369 (Eleventh Circuit, 2018)
United States v. Vega-Castillo
540 F.3d 1235 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Demetrius Devon Fitzgerald, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-demetrius-devon-fitzgerald-ca11-2018.