United States v. Demetrick Smith

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 5, 2013
Docket12-40793
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Demetrick Smith (United States v. Demetrick Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Demetrick Smith, (5th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

Case: 12-40793 Document: 00512262580 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/04/2013

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED June 4, 2013 No. 12-40793 c/w No. 12-40794 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DEMETRICK LEON SMITH,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:97-CR-157-5

Before KING, CLEMENT, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Demetrick Leon Smith appeals orders of the district court denying him a reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and denying his motion to order the name on his judgment of conviction be changed to Abduss al- Muqtaidir-Sabir Abdullah, the name Smith adopted pursuant to his Islamic faith. The Government moves for summary affirmance or, in the alternative, for an extension of the time to file a brief. Smith makes no arguments as to the

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 12-40793 Document: 00512262580 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/04/2013

No. 12-40793 c/w No. 12-40794

order denying § 3582(c)(2) relief and has waived any challenge to that order. See United States v. Green, 964 F.2d 365, 371 (5th Cir. 1992). While we recognize that Muslim prisoners may adopt new names, we find no error in the district court’s denial of the motion to change Smith’s committed name. See Felix v. Rolan, 833 F.2d 517, 518-19 (5th Cir. 1988). MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE GRANTED; AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Demetrick Smith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-demetrick-smith-ca5-2013.