United States v. Demarcus Baxter

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 29, 2025
Docket25-6289
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Demarcus Baxter (United States v. Demarcus Baxter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Demarcus Baxter, (4th Cir. 2025).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6289 Doc: 10 Filed: 07/29/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-6289

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DEMARCUS BAXTER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:01-cr-00380-CMC-1)

Submitted: July 24, 2025 Decided: July 29, 2025

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Demarcus Baxter, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-6289 Doc: 10 Filed: 07/29/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Demarcus Baxter appeals the district court’s order granting in part his 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release and reducing his sentence by 24

months. On appeal, Baxter disputes the court’s decision not to award an even greater

sentence reduction. Upon review, we discern no abuse of discretion in the district court’s

determination that, under the pertinent 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, only a 24-

month reduction was warranted. See United States v. Centeno-Morales, 90 F.4th 274, 279-

80 (4th Cir. 2024) (providing standard of review and outlining steps for evaluating

compassionate release motions). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Angel Centeno-Morales
90 F.4th 274 (Fourth Circuit, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Demarcus Baxter, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-demarcus-baxter-ca4-2025.