United States v. Delgado-Gama
This text of 115 F. App'x 304 (United States v. Delgado-Gama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Juan Delgado-Gama (“Delgado-Gama”) appeals his conviction for illegal reentry into the United States after having been convicted of an aggravated felony. Delgado-Gama argues that subsection (b)(2) of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 is a sentencing provision and that the district court erred in instructing the jury that the Government was required to prove that he had been deported after a conviction for an aggravated felony. He contends that he was prejudiced by the district court’s erroneous jury instruction because evidence of his prior criminal history was introduced at trial. He further contends that the district court abused its discretion in admitting the testimony of a fingerprint expert at trial.
Delgado-Gama is correct that the district court erred in instructing the jury that the Government had to prove that he was deported following an aggravated felony conviction. See Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 226-27, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Nevertheless, because the evidence of Delgado-Gama’s guilt was overwhelming, the erroneous jury instruction and consequently the introduction of his prior criminal history at trial, had no affect on Delgado-Gama’s substantial rights. See United States v. Brown, 161 F.3d 256, 259 (5th Cir.1998) (en banc); United States v. Arteaga-Limones, 529 F.2d 1183, 1199 (5th Cir.1976).
Additionally, Delgado-Gama has failed to show that the district court plainly erred in admitting expert testimony at trial. See United States v. Ramirez-Velasquez, 322 F.3d 868, 878-79 (5th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 840, 124 S.Ct. 107, 157 L.Ed.2d 74 (2003).
Accordingly, Delgado-Gama’s conviction is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 F. App'x 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-delgado-gama-ca5-2004.