United States v. Delgado-Gama

115 F. App'x 304
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 20, 2004
Docket03-20968
StatusUnpublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 115 F. App'x 304 (United States v. Delgado-Gama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Delgado-Gama, 115 F. App'x 304 (5th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Juan Delgado-Gama (“Delgado-Gama”) appeals his conviction for illegal reentry into the United States after having been convicted of an aggravated felony. Delgado-Gama argues that subsection (b)(2) of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 is a sentencing provision and that the district court erred in instructing the jury that the Government was required to prove that he had been deported after a conviction for an aggravated felony. He contends that he was prejudiced by the district court’s erroneous jury instruction because evidence of his prior criminal history was introduced at trial. He further contends that the district court abused its discretion in admitting the testimony of a fingerprint expert at trial.

Delgado-Gama is correct that the district court erred in instructing the jury that the Government had to prove that he was deported following an aggravated felony conviction. See Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 226-27, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Nevertheless, because the evidence of Delgado-Gama’s guilt was overwhelming, the erroneous jury instruction and consequently the introduction of his prior criminal history at trial, had no affect on Delgado-Gama’s substantial rights. See United States v. Brown, 161 F.3d 256, 259 (5th Cir.1998) (en banc); United States v. Arteaga-Limones, 529 F.2d 1183, 1199 (5th Cir.1976).

Additionally, Delgado-Gama has failed to show that the district court plainly erred in admitting expert testimony at trial. See United States v. Ramirez-Velasquez, 322 F.3d 868, 878-79 (5th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 840, 124 S.Ct. 107, 157 L.Ed.2d 74 (2003).

Accordingly, Delgado-Gama’s conviction is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Delgado-Gama
210 F. App'x 377 (Fifth Circuit, 2006)
Delgado-Gama v. United States
544 U.S. 995 (Supreme Court, 2005)
Bishop v. United States
544 U.S. 995 (Supreme Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 F. App'x 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-delgado-gama-ca5-2004.