United States v. Dejour Peterson

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: June 17, 2025
• Docket: 25-6008
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6008 Doc: 20 Filed: 06/17/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-6008

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DEJOUR AIKE PETERSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge. (1:16-cr-00258-TDS-1)

Submitted: June 12, 2025 Decided: June 17, 2025

Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dejour Aike Peterson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-6008 Doc: 20 Filed: 06/17/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Dejour Aike Peterson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction. “We review a district court’s decision

[whether] to reduce a sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion and its

ruling as to the scope of its legal authority under § 3582(c)(2) de novo.” United States v.

Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304 (4th Cir. 2013). Our review of the record reveals no error. The

court clearly understood its authority to reduce Peterson’s sentence and recognized

Peterson’s postsentencing conduct, but the court declined to grant a reduction based on its

review of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors.

Accordingly, we deny Peterson’s motion to seal and affirm the district court’s order.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED