United States v. Decator
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6129
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KITTRELL BERNARD DECATOR,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:95-cr-00202-CCB-1)
Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 6, 2010
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kittrell Bernard Decator, Appellant Pro Se. James G. Warwick, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kittrell Bernard Decator appeals the district court’s
margin order denying Decator’s “Motion to Dismiss Indictment
Nunc Pro Tunc.” We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v.
Decator, No. 1:95-cr-00202-CCB-1 (D. Md. Dec. 29, 2009). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Decator (United States v. Decator) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.