United States v. Decator

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Decator

373 F. App'x 330

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 6, 2010·No. No. 10-6129·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kittrell Bernard Decator appeals the district court’s margin order denying De-cator’s “Motion to Dismiss Indictment Nunc Pro Tunc.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Decator, No. 1:95-cr-00202-CCB-1 (D.Md. Dec. 29, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Kittrell Bernard Decator appeals the district court’s margin order denying De-cator’s “Motion to Dismiss Indictment Nunc Pro Tunc.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Decator, No. 1:95-cr-00202-CCB-1 (D.Md. Dec. 29, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Decator, 373 F. App'x 330 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

373 F. App'x 330 (United States v. Decator) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.