United States v. Debardelaben
This text of 388 F.2d 309 (United States v. Debardelaben) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, for the Use and Benefit of PALMER ASPHALT COMPANY, Appellee,
v.
Lindsay A. DEBARDELABEN and Inez P. Debardelaben, Individually and t/a Guaranteed Waterproofing Company, and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Appellants.
No. 11340.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued November 8, 1967.
Decided November 10, 1967.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence; Robert W. Hemphill, Judge.
C. Weston Houck, Florence, S. C., for appellants.
Alton G. Murchison, III, Charlotte, N. C. (Levine, Goodman & Murchison, Charlotte, N. C., on brief), for appellee.
Before BOREMAN, Circuit Judge, MARVIN JONES, Senior Judge, U. S. Court of Claims,* and CRAVEN, Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
For the reasons stated by the district court,1 the judgment below is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
388 F.2d 309, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-debardelaben-ca4-1967.