United States v. Davis
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 30, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
No. 03-40678 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
FRANTZ LEROY DAVIS,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-02-CR-274-1 --------------------
Before Jones, Benavides, and Clement, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Retained counsel for Frantz Leroy Davis has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Davis was sent a copy of
counsel’s motion and brief, but has not filed a response. Our
independent review of the brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is granted, counsel is excused from further
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 03-40678 -2-
responsibilities herein, and the appeal is dismissed. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
The case is remanded for the purpose of correcting a
clerical error in the judgment. See FED. R. CRIM. P. 36.
The amended judgment should reflect that Counts Two and Three of
the superseding indictment were dismissed upon the Government’s
motion.
MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF
CLERICAL ERROR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Davis (United States v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.