United States v. Davis

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 269 F.3d 514
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 30, 2004·No. 03-40678·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 30, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

No. 03-40678 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FRANTZ LEROY DAVIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-02-CR-274-1 --------------------

Before Jones, Benavides, and Clement, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Retained counsel for Frantz Leroy Davis has moved for leave

to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Davis was sent a copy of

counsel’s motion and brief, but has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is granted, counsel is excused from further

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 03-40678 -2-

responsibilities herein, and the appeal is dismissed. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

The case is remanded for the purpose of correcting a

clerical error in the judgment. See FED. R. CRIM. P. 36.

The amended judgment should reflect that Counts Two and Three of

the superseding indictment were dismissed upon the Government’s

motion.

MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF

CLERICAL ERROR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Davis, (5th Cir. 2004).

United States v. Davis (United States v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)