United States v. Davis

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 226 F.3d 346
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 12, 2002·No. 01-40828·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40828 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DON EDWARD DAVIS, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. V-00-CR-84-ALL -------------------- April 11, 2002

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Michael K. Burns, appointed counsel for Don Edward Davis,

Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Davis has

filed a response. Our independent review of the brief, Davis's

response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Davis's motion for

appointment of new counsel is DENIED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Davis, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Davis (United States v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)