United States v. Davis

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 19, 2000
Docket99-60107
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Davis (United States v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Davis, (5th Cir. 2000).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-60107 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GERALD EDWARD DAVIS, also known as Gerald E. Davis,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:98-CR-90-ALL-LS - - - - - - - - - - June 16, 2000

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gerald Edward Davis appeals his conviction and sentence

following a jury trial for being a felon in possession of a

firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Davis argues that

the district court erred when it denied his motion for judgment

of acquittal asserting that the evidence at trial was

insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. See United States v.

Jones, 133 F.3d 358, 362 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1144

(1998)(this court reviews de novo the denial of a motion for

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-60107 -2-

judgment of acquittal). Specifically, Davis challenges the

conclusion that he possessed the firearms.

An undercover agent with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and

Firearms, testified that he purchased several firearms from

Davis, while Davis was working at his wife’s pawn shop. Despite

Davis’ testimony to the contrary, the agent’s testimony supported

the conclusion that Davis possessed the firearms. See United

States v. Guerrero, 169 F.3d 933, 939 (5th Cir. 1999)(holding

that this court must accept the credibility choices that support

the jury’s verdict and will not re-weigh the evidence).

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Jones
133 F.3d 358 (Fifth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Guerrero
169 F.3d 933 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Davis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-davis-ca5-2000.