United States v. Davis
This text of United States v. Davis (United States v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-60107 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GERALD EDWARD DAVIS, also known as Gerald E. Davis,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:98-CR-90-ALL-LS - - - - - - - - - - June 16, 2000
Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Gerald Edward Davis appeals his conviction and sentence
following a jury trial for being a felon in possession of a
firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Davis argues that
the district court erred when it denied his motion for judgment
of acquittal asserting that the evidence at trial was
insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. See United States v.
Jones, 133 F.3d 358, 362 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1144
(1998)(this court reviews de novo the denial of a motion for
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-60107 -2-
judgment of acquittal). Specifically, Davis challenges the
conclusion that he possessed the firearms.
An undercover agent with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and
Firearms, testified that he purchased several firearms from
Davis, while Davis was working at his wife’s pawn shop. Despite
Davis’ testimony to the contrary, the agent’s testimony supported
the conclusion that Davis possessed the firearms. See United
States v. Guerrero, 169 F.3d 933, 939 (5th Cir. 1999)(holding
that this court must accept the credibility choices that support
the jury’s verdict and will not re-weigh the evidence).
Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Davis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-davis-ca5-2000.