United States v. Davis

89 F. App'x 461
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 269 F.3d 514
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 11, 2004·No. 03-30797·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM. *

Court-appointed appellate counsel for Donald Ray Davis has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Davis was advised of the motion and served with a copy of his counsel’s brief, but has not filed a response.

*462 Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Appointed counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Davis, 89 F. App'x 461 (5th Cir. 2004).

89 F. App'x 461 (United States v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)