United States v. Davis

220 F. App'x 197
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 102 F. App'x 815
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 1, 2007·No. No. 06-7583·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Angelo Demond Davis appeals from the district court’s order denying relief on his motions for reconsideration filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). Our review of the record discloses that this appeal is without merit. Davis’s motions for reconsideration do not demonstrate that his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) was improperly dismissed. We therefore find that the district court’s denial of his motions for reconsideration was not an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and affirm the district court’s order on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Davis, Nos. 3:04-cr-00030, 3:06-cv-00022-V-l (W.D.N.C. Aug. 15, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Davis, 220 F. App'x 197 (4th Cir. 2007).

220 F. App'x 197 (United States v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related