United States v. Davis
Opinion
Walter Jacob Davis appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider prior orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. - See United States v. Davis, No. CA-94-73-5-1-F (E.D.N.C. filed Oct. 20, 2004 & entered Oct. 21, 2004; filed Nov. 24, 2004 & entered Dec. 9, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
131 F. App'x 957 (United States v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.