United States v. Davis
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7583
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ANGELO DEMOND DAVIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (3:04-cr-00030; 3:06-cv-00022-V-1)
Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: March 1, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Angelo Demond Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina; Gretchen C.F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Angelo Demond Davis appeals from the district court's
order denying relief on his motions for reconsideration filed
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Our review of the record
discloses that this appeal is without merit. Davis’s motions for
reconsideration do not demonstrate that his motion filed pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) was improperly dismissed. We therefore
find that the district court's denial of his motions for
reconsideration was not an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we
deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and affirm the district
court’s order on the reasoning of the district court. See United
States v. Davis, Nos. 3:04-cr-00030, 3:06-cv-00022-V-1 (W.D.N.C.
Aug. 15, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Davis (United States v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.