United States v. Davis
This text of 311 F. App'x 247 (United States v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Marlin Davis appeals from the order reducing his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and Amendment 706 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines.1 In filing his § 3582(c)(2) motion, Davis argued that under Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d [248]*248403 (2004) and United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), the district court could consider evidence to depart below the amended Guideline range in resentencing, as this range was only advisory. The district court disagreed, granting only the two-level reduction in accordance with Amendment 706, and resentencing Davis to the minimum term permitted by the amended Guideline range.
We affirm based on United States v. Melvin, 556 F.3d 1190 (11th Cir.2009).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
311 F. App'x 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-davis-ca11-2009.