United States v. David Yepez
This text of United States v. David Yepez (United States v. David Yepez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 09-50271 v. D.C. No. 3:08-cr-03499- DAVID YEPEZ, LAB-1 Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-50409 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D.C. No. 3:08-cr-02350-L-1 AUDENAGO ACOSTA-MONTES, ORDER Defendant-Appellee. Filed March 1, 2012
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Cir- cuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judge Christen did not participate in the deliberations or vote in these cases.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. David Yepez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-david-yepez-ca9-2012.