United States v. David Paul Hammer
This text of 239 F.3d 302 (United States v. David Paul Hammer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING
The petition for rehearing filed by appellant David Paul Hammer in the above captioned matter having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court and to all the other available circuit judges of the court in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court en bane, the petition for rehearing is denied. Judge Stapleton’s and Judge Greenberg’s votes are limited to denying rehearing before the original panel. Judge Nygaard would grant rehearing by the court en banc and is filing an opinion sur denial of the petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 F.3d 302, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 564, 2001 WL 92168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-david-paul-hammer-ca3-2001.