United States v. Davage

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 4, 1999·No. 98-7434·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7434

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GERALD DAVID DAVAGE,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 98-7514

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CR-94-41-JFM, CA-97-4198-JFM)

Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: March 4, 1999 Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gerald David Davage, Appellant Pro Se. Bryan Edwin Foreman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Gerald Davage seeks to appeal the district court’s order deny-

ing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998), and order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability, deny Davage’s motion for discovery, and dismiss the ap-

peals on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v.

Davage, Nos. CR-94-41-JFM; CA-97-4198-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 26, 1998;

Sept. 28, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Davage, (4th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Davage (United States v. Davage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related