United States v. Davage
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6187
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GERALD DAVID DAVAGE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CR-94-41)
Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 23, 1997
Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gerald David Davage, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne A. Battaglia, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Gerald David Davage appeals the district court's order denying
his motion for provision of a transcript. We have reviewed the rec-
ord and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
United States v. Davage, No. CR-94-41 (D. Md. Nov. 4 & Dec. 24, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Davage (United States v. Davage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.