United States v. Darity

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 3, 2011
Docket10-7662
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Darity (United States v. Darity) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Darity, (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7662

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL LEROY DARITY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:95-cr-00132-MR-1)

Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 3, 2011

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Leroy Darity, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael Leroy Darity appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his motion for modification of sentence,

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Darity,

No. 1:95-cr-00132-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 12, 2010). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Darity, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-darity-ca4-2011.