United States v. Darby
This text of 439 F. App'x 238 (United States v. Darby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Joe Nathan Darby seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of an earlier order in which the court denied Darby’s motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
The text order from which Darby appeals contained two additional orders related to a Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. Darby, however, only appeals the district court's order on his motion to reconsider the denial of § 3582(c) relief.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
439 F. App'x 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-darby-ca4-2011.