United States v. Dante Vargas-Amaya

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Dante Vargas-Amaya

408 F.3d 1227, 2005 D.A.R. 6074, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 9535

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 25, 2005

Docket03-50577

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 408 F.3d 1227 (United States v. Dante Vargas-Amaya) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Dante Vargas-Amaya, 408 F.3d 1227, 2005 D.A.R. 6074, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 9535 (9th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinions

Dissent by

Judge CALLAHAN.

ORDER

The panel has voted to deny the government’s petition for panel rehearing. Judge Fisher votes to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges T.G. Nelson and Tashima so recommend. A judge of the court requested a vote on whether to rehear the .matter en banc, but the matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonreeused active judges in favor of en banc rehearing.

The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI