United States v. Danny Jarrett
Opinion
Danny Jarrett appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) sentence-reduction motion based on Amendment 750 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. We conclude that the denial was proper, because the amendment did not lower Jarrett’s applicable Guidelines range. See United States v. Washington, 618 F.3d 869, 872 (8th Cir.2010) (sentence reduction under § 3582(c)(2) is not authorized where amendment does not have effect of lowering defendant’s applicable Guidelines range). Accordingly, we affirm. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, subject to counsel informing Jarrett about procedures for seeking rehearing or filing a petition for certiorari.
. The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
504 F. App'x 553 (United States v. Danny Jarrett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.