United States v. Daniels

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Daniels

623 F. App'x 102

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 24, 2015·No. No. 15-7439·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gerald Jermaine Daniels appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Daniels, No. 4:05-cr-00033-MSD-TEM-l (E.D.Va. filed Aug. 28, 2015 & entered Aug. 31, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[103] fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gerald Jermaine Daniels appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Daniels, No. 4:05-cr-00033-MSD-TEM-l (E.D.Va. filed Aug. 28, 2015 & entered Aug. 31, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[103] fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Daniels, 623 F. App'x 102 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

623 F. App'x 102 (United States v. Daniels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related