United States v. Daniel Carson Lewis

421 F.3d 1152, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 18978, 2005 WL 2098862
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 1, 2005·No. 03-30281·Published

Opinion

HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

We considered this case in July of 2004 and we affirmed the convictions and the sentence. United States v. Lewis, 111 Fed.Appx. 876 (9th Cir.2004). The Supreme Court granted certiorari, and vacated the decision and remanded the case to us in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Lends v. United States, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 1404, 161 L.Ed.2d 175 (2005). Because Petitioner did not challenge his sentence on Sixth Amendment grounds in the district court, we grant a limited remand pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 915-16 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that “defendants are entitled to limited remands in all pending direct criminal appeals involving unpreserved Booker error, whether constitutional or nonconstitutional”).

REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Daniel Carson Lewis, 421 F.3d 1152, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 18978, 2005 WL 2098862 (9th Cir. 2005).

421 F.3d 1152 (United States v. Daniel Carson Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)
United States v. Alfred Arnold Ameline
409 F.3d 1073 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Isidro Moreno-Hernandez
419 F.3d 906 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Lewis
111 F. App'x 876 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)