United States v. Dandridge

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-4656

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DON ANTONIO DANDRIDGE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. Glen M. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-03-119)

Submitted: February 18, 2005 Decided: March 8, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John P. Bradwell, SHORTRIDGE & SHORTRIDGE, P.C., Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellant. John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, R. Lucas Hobbs, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Don Antonio Dandridge appeals from his conviction for

being a felon in possession of a firearm. On appeal, he challenges

the denial of his motions to suppress and to dismiss his

indictment. We have reviewed the briefs and joint appendix and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. (See J.A. at 17-19, 23, 38-48). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -