United States v. Dandridge

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 8, 2005
Docket04-4656
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Dandridge (United States v. Dandridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Dandridge, (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-4656

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DON ANTONIO DANDRIDGE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. Glen M. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-03-119)

Submitted: February 18, 2005 Decided: March 8, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John P. Bradwell, SHORTRIDGE & SHORTRIDGE, P.C., Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellant. John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, R. Lucas Hobbs, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Don Antonio Dandridge appeals from his conviction for

being a felon in possession of a firearm. On appeal, he challenges

the denial of his motions to suppress and to dismiss his

indictment. We have reviewed the briefs and joint appendix and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. (See J.A. at 17-19, 23, 38-48). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Dandridge, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dandridge-ca4-2005.