United States v. Dalton

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Dalton. Read the opinion of the Court — 433 F. App'x 164
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 6, 2010·No. 10-6591·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6591

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

KENNETH TERRELL DALTON, a/k/a Kenneth Dalton, a/k/a Pookie,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:03-cr-00004-RLV-13)

Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 6, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Terrell Dalton, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Terrell Dalton appeals the district court’s

order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for

reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Dalton, No. 5:03-cr-

00004-RLV-13 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 16, 2010). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Dalton, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Dalton (United States v. Dalton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related