United States v. Daley

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7713

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

RICHARD CHARLES DALEY,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:02-cr-00251-REP-2)

Submitted: January 13, 2009 Decided: January 20, 2009

Before WILLIAMS, Chief, Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert James Wagner, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Richard Daniel Cooke, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Richard Charles Daley appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Daley, No. 3:02-cr-00251-REP-2 (E.D. Va. Aug. 11, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED