United States v. Dabbs
This text of 134 F.3d 1071 (United States v. Dabbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
BARKETT, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part:
I concur in the majority opinion except as to the majority’s affirmance of the restitution
order imposed against appellant Floyd. I do not believe that the record reflects that the district
court considered Floyd’s ability to pay $593,456.82 in restitution, especially where the PSI
found that Floyd did not have the ability to pay a fine within the guideline range of $6,000 to
$60,000. Accordingly, I would remand the case to the district court for consideration of Floyd’s
ability to pay.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
134 F.3d 1071, 1998 WL 46292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dabbs-ca11-1998.