United States v. Curtis

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Curtis

329 F. App'x 385

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 3, 2009·No. No. 08-8415·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Curtis appeals the district court’s order granting his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and reducing his sentence to 325 months of imprisonment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Curtis, No. 2:89-cr-00054-1 (S.D.W.Va. Oct. 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Curtis appeals the district court’s order granting his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and reducing his sentence to 325 months of imprisonment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Curtis, No. 2:89-cr-00054-1 (S.D.W.Va. Oct. 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Curtis, 329 F. App'x 385 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

329 F. App'x 385 (United States v. Curtis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related