United States v. Curry
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7180
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RAYMOND DONALD CURRY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:04-cr-00045-JPB-1)
Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 20, 2009
Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brian Christopher Crockett, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Raymond Donald Curry appeals a district court’s order
granting in part and denying in part his motion for a sentence
reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) based on the crack
cocaine amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines. The district
court reduced Curry’s sentence to the minimum of the amended
Guidelines range. Curry asserts that the district court erred
in failing to further reduce his sentence. Curry’s argument is
foreclosed by this court’s decision in United States v. Dunphy,
551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Curry (United States v. Curry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.