United States v. Cupples

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
• Decided: July 20, 2023
• Docket: 22-50726
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 22-50726 Document: 00516828049 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/20/2023

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 22-50726 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ July 20, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

James Robert Cupples,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:21-CR-367-1 ______________________________

Before Jolly, Smith, and Duncan, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * James Robert Cupples pleaded guilty to one count of receipt of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2) and (b)(1). The district court sentenced him to 198 months of imprisonment, to be followed by 10 years of supervised release. Cupples challenges the application of a higher offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2G2.1 by operation of the cross-reference in

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 22-50726 Document: 00516828049 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/20/2023

No. 22-50726

U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(c)(1), which “is to be construed broadly.” § 2G2.2, comment. (n.7(A)). We review the district court’s interpretation and application of the Guidelines de novo and its factual findings for clear error. See United States v. Ferris, 52 F.4th 235, 239 (5th Cir. 2022), cert. denied, 143 S. Ct. 846 (2023). The record supports the district court’s determination that the Government proved, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Cupples caused a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing a visual depiction of such conduct. See § 2G2.2, comment. (n.7(A)); United States v. Landreneau, 967 F.3d 443, 451 (5th Cir. 2020); United States v. Rodriguez, 630 F.3d 377, 380 (5th Cir. 2011). And as Cupples concedes, the court properly enhanced his sentence under § 2G2.1(b)(2)(A) because the offense involved the commission of sexual contact. See United States v. Butler, 65 F.4th 199, 201-03 (5th Cir. 2023); United States v. Salinas, 918 F.3d 463, 465 (5th Cir. 2019). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.