United States v. Cunningham
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Cunningham. Read the opinion of the Court — 113 F.3d 289 →
Opinion
USCA1 Opinion
July 21, 1995
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 95-1625
UNITED STATES,
Appellee,
v.
REX W. CUNNINGHAM, JR.,
Defendant, Appellant.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Frank H. Freedman, Senior U.S. District Judge] __________________________
____________________
Before
Selya, Cyr and Boudin,
Circuit Judges. ______________
____________________
Barbara J. Sweeney and Jack F. St. Clair on brief for appellant. __________________ _________________
Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Todd E. Newhouse, ________________ _________________
Assistant United States Attorney, for appellee.
____________________
____________________
Per Curiam. This is an appeal from a pre-trial ___________
detention order. We have independently reviewed the facts
and the record, while giving deference to the findings of the
magistrate judge and district court. See United States v. ___ ______________
O'Brien, 895 F.2d 810, 814 (1st Cir. 1990). For essentially _______
the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's Memorandum and
Order, dated May 10, 1995, we affirm the detention order.
Affirmed. ________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Cunningham, (1st Cir. 1995).
United States v. Cunningham (United States v. Cunningham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Edward O'Brien
895 F.2d 810 (First Circuit, 1990)