United States v. Cunningham

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Cunningham. Read the opinion of the Court — 113 F.3d 289
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided July 21, 1995·No. 95-1625·Published

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion



July 21, 1995
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 95-1625

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

REX W. CUNNINGHAM, JR.,

Defendant, Appellant.

____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Frank H. Freedman, Senior U.S. District Judge] __________________________

____________________

Before

Selya, Cyr and Boudin,
Circuit Judges. ______________

____________________

Barbara J. Sweeney and Jack F. St. Clair on brief for appellant. __________________ _________________
Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Todd E. Newhouse, ________________ _________________
Assistant United States Attorney, for appellee.

____________________

____________________

Per Curiam. This is an appeal from a pre-trial ___________

detention order. We have independently reviewed the facts

and the record, while giving deference to the findings of the

magistrate judge and district court. See United States v. ___ ______________

O'Brien, 895 F.2d 810, 814 (1st Cir. 1990). For essentially _______

the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's Memorandum and

Order, dated May 10, 1995, we affirm the detention order.

Affirmed. ________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cunningham, (1st Cir. 1995).

United States v. Cunningham (United States v. Cunningham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Edward O'Brien
895 F.2d 810 (First Circuit, 1990)