United States v. Cunningham

62 F.3d 1411, 1995 WL 430255
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Cunningham. Read the opinion of the Court — 113 F.3d 289
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided July 21, 1995·No. 95-1625·Unpublished

Opinion

62 F.3d 1411

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.
UNITED STATES, Appellee,
v.
Rex W. CUNNINGHAM, Jr., Defendant, Appellant.

No. 95-1625.

United States Court of Appeals,
First Circuit.

July 21, 1995.

Barbara J. Sweeney and Jack F. St. Clair on brief for appellant.

Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Todd E. Newhouse, Assistant United States Attorney, for appellee.

D.Mass.

AFFIRMED.

Before SELYA, CYR and BOUDIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a pre-trial detention order. We have independently reviewed the facts and the record, while giving deference to the findings of the magistrate judge and district court. See United States v. O'Brien, 895 F.2d 810, 814 (1st Cir.1990). For essentially the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's Memorandum and Order, dated May 10, 1995, we affirm the detention order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cunningham, 62 F.3d 1411, 1995 WL 430255 (1st Cir. 1995).

62 F.3d 1411 (United States v. Cunningham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Edward O'Brien
895 F.2d 810 (First Circuit, 1990)