United States v. Cuellar

478 F.3d 282
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Cuellar. Read the opinion of the Court — 478 F.3d 282
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 3, 2006·No. 05-10065·Published

Opinion

454 F.3d 505

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Humberto Fidel Regalado CUELLAR, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 05-10065.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 30, 2006.

Nancy E. Larson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Fort Worth, TX, Denise B. Williams (argued), Amanda R. Burch, Lubbock, TX, for U.S.

Jerry V. Beard, Asst. Fed. Pub. Def. (argued), Lubbock, TX, for Cuellar.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Sam R. Cummings, Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion Feb. 22, 2006, 5 Cir., 2006, 441 F.3d 329)

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and KING, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cuellar, 478 F.3d 282 (5th Cir. 2006).

478 F.3d 282 (United States v. Cuellar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Cuellar
441 F.3d 329 (Fifth Circuit, 2006)