United States v. Cuellar
This text of United States v. Cuellar (United States v. Cuellar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 18, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
No. 04-50146 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SILVESTRE CUELLAR,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-03-CR-1087-1-KC --------------------
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Relying on Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004),
Silvestre Cuellar argues that the district court erred by
imposing a sentence based on facts that were neither admitted nor
found by a jury beyond reasonable doubt. The Government has
moved for summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s
brief because the issue is foreclosed in this circuit under
United States v. Pineiro, No. 03-30437, 2004 WL 1543170, at *1
(5th Cir. July 12, 2004). The issue is indeed foreclosed. The
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 04-50146 -2-
Government’s motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district
court is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Cuellar, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cuellar-ca5-2004.