United States v. Crowder

472 F. App'x 156
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 1, 2012
DocketNo. 12-6173
StatusPublished

This text of 472 F. App'x 156 (United States v. Crowder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Crowder, 472 F. App'x 156 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Chevelle Crowder appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his motion seeking a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). As we have recognized, however, a district-court has no authority to grant a motion to reconsider its previous order denying a 3582(c) motion. United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.2010). And in any event, it is evident from the record that Crowder is [157]*157ineligible for the sentence reduction that he seeks. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. United States v. Crowder, No. 4:08-cr-00002-JLK-2, 2012 WL 244481 (W.D.Va. Jan. 26, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Goodwyn
596 F.3d 233 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
472 F. App'x 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-crowder-ca4-2012.