United States v. Cross

476 F. App'x 537
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 19, 2012
DocketNos. 12-6365, 12-6372
StatusPublished

This text of 476 F. App'x 537 (United States v. Cross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Cross, 476 F. App'x 537 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Terrence Cross appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion and motion for reconsideration under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We affirm the denial of 18 U.S .C. § 3582(c)(2) relief for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cross, No. 2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1 (E.D.Va. Jan. 19, 2010). Because the district court lacked the authority to consider Cross’s motion for reconsideration, see United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.2010), we affirm [538]*538the district court’s order denying the motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Goodwyn
596 F.3d 233 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
476 F. App'x 537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cross-ca4-2012.