United States v. Crenshaw

10 F. App'x 93

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Guy Carmichael Crenshaw appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (1994). Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Crenshaw, No. CR-96-47 (W.D.Va. Nov. 13, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.