United States v. Crawford
This text of United States v. Crawford (United States v. Crawford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 20, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 04-11067 Clerk Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DALE LEE CRAWFORD,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:03-CR-67-1-G --------------------
Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Dale Lee
Crawford has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Crawford has not responded to counsel’s motion. Our independent
review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Crawford, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-crawford-ca5-2005.